From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a760d4523f3aea17
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-14 07:59:16 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!lnsnews.lns.cornell.edu!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!portc01.blue.aol.com!uunet!dca.uu.net!ash.uu.net!world!bobduff
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Storage Pool
Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Message-ID: <wccvglzjei7.fsf@world.std.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:57:20 GMT
References: <mailman.992475201.8456.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8729
Date: 2001-06-14T14:57:20+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

ANH_VO@udlp.com writes:

> Could you elaborate more on your NO answer? I do not have enough evidence to say
> either way. However, based on test results from GNAT 3.13p, the answer is yes. I
> need to conduct further test using APEX and ObjectAda. If it works as GNAT, I
> will post the codes.

I don't think the RM guarantees that Size_In_Storage_Element mod
Alignment = 0, but you may be right that it's always true in practise.

In any case, I think there's nothing wrong with writing a storage pool
that *requires* this property (or any other property), and tell users
of the pool that they must obey.

- Bob