From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5037bf0bb33408c8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-14 10:55:54 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!uunet!lax.uu.net!sac.uu.net!ash.uu.net!world!news From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: "&" for array versus "&" for Strings User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 17:54:31 GMT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29775 Date: 2002-10-14T17:54:31+00:00 List-Id: "Eric G. Miller" writes: > In , Preben Randhol wrote: > > Print_Names ("Ada " & "Babbel"); > AFAIK, "Ada " & "Babbel" is type String(1..12) not Name_Array(1..2). The expression "Ada " & "Babbel" could be of various types, depending on context. You can't say it "is" of type String all by itself. In the context of Print_Names ("Ada " & "Babbel");, the type is determined (in part) by the type of the formal parameter. - Bob