From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,21960280f1d61e84 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How come Ada isn't more popular? Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:23:18 -0500 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: pcls4.std.com 1171290199 22795 192.74.137.71 (12 Feb 2007 14:23:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:23:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7y3KoNo35OvVDn2w4piathvcu/c= Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:9285 Date: 2007-02-12T09:23:18-05:00 List-Id: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" writes: > * Ideally, when deriving the programmer should be able to specify his > intent: whether the new type is equivalent, a generalization (extension), a > specialization (constraining) or both/neither. I've been thinking the same thing. What language has that capability? - Bob