From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,81633e7277ffacee X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada containers and custom allocators Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:41:31 -0500 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: <472f2c87-1238-42a5-8b94-92e9b70981da@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: pcls6.std.com 1200091291 18836 192.74.137.71 (11 Jan 2008 22:41:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:41:31 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7mvWGi/MpxAGMbdwvBln6pXD9KE= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19331 Date: 2008-01-11T17:41:31-05:00 List-Id: Maciej Sobczak writes: > This works in C++ and gives spectacular performance improvements. It's > a pity Ada does not provide anything in this area. Why does it give spectacular performance improvements? Doesn't this indicate that the default storage management is needlessly inefficient? - Bob