From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!198.186.194.249.MISMATCH!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!panix!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: put of access type Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:41:14 -0400 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: <4a8ce6a0$1@news.post.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: pcls6.std.com 1250865674 13294 192.74.137.71 (21 Aug 2009 14:41:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:41:14 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:JTWCx1KNwxk0Kr9MhaOWZK3k36o= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6973 Date: 2009-08-21T10:41:14-04:00 List-Id: Stephen Leake writes: > The same goes for access types for unconstrained arrays; they just > don't make sense if you don't know about the dope. Well, you have to know that unconstrained arrays have bounds. That's not specific to access types -- the same is true for parameters and so forth. Do you need to know how the bounds are stored for a parameter of type String in order to understand such parameters? - Bob