From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a4cc6fdc99d3fe2a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-05-30 18:39:54 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.skycache.com!Cidera!news-reader.ntrnet.net!uunet!ash.uu.net!world!bobduff
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: package body functionality
Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Message-ID: <wccu222e1sk.fsf@world.std.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 01:37:47 GMT
References: <9eoeiv$h8$1@eol.dd.chalmers.se> <u66ekm0m5.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7905
Date: 2001-05-31T01:37:47+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Stephen Leake <stephen.a.leake.1@gsfc.nasa.gov> writes:

> To be safe, package A should have a 'pragma Elaborate' for the package
> containing 'some_function_outside_A', and similarly for B.

A pragma Elaborate_All is almost always better than pragma Elaborate,
because it is transitive.

- Bob