From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,af92cb4b0cc736af X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-11-04 12:09:19 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!priapus.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!uunet!ash.uu.net!world!news From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: problem with abstract types User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 20:08:24 GMT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: <2i26qa-i63.ln@uli.uli-eckhardt.de> <3p96qa-q51.ln@uli.uli-eckhardt.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:30358 Date: 2002-11-04T20:08:24+00:00 List-Id: "David C. Hoos" writes: > FWIW, the use of the Registry is deprecated for new development. > There is, in fact, for the "modern" versions of windows an > application data directory designated by the environment variable > APPDATA which has underneath it a directory for each > manufacturer of the application software. Is this a joke?! If not, I'm astonished. Can you point to some docs on this? Too bad the registry wasn't deprecated immediately upon being invented -- it's an utterly bad idea. - Bob