From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,PLING_QUERY
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,478ee4201c470ff5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-30 12:19:46 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.tufts.edu!uunet!dca.uu.net!ash.uu.net!world!news
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Subject: Re: Repost: Nobody interested to judge which compiler is right?!
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself)
Message-ID: <wccu1fqjsqn.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 20:19:12 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
References: <mailman.15.1043910058.30820.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <5ad0dd8a.0301301052.251bf0e3@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33616
Date: 2003-01-30T20:19:12+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

wojtek@power.com.pl (Wojtek Narczynski) writes:

> Now that I know that GNAT is not compliant, do you think I should
> report it?

Yes!

I haven't completely followed this thread, but surely it's a good thing
for the Ada community if all Ada compilers agree on what's legal and
what isn't.

- Bob