From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9fb8e2af320d5b3e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Bus error
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:01:47 -0400
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Message-ID: <wcctzssalbo.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: <1182954233.788124.17920@c77g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
 <1182974545.047564.236590@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
 <1182977295.227318.259300@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: pcls4.std.com 1182996107 878 192.74.137.71 (28 Jun 2007 02:01:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 02:01:47 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LO3M7O1MIiF3tNkwMgfW4injZss=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16328
Date: 2007-06-27T22:01:47-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com> writes:

> On 27 Cze, 22:02, Anh Vo <anhvofrc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> However, if the return statement is fully qualified as below, it works
>> fine on all versions
>>
>> $$$       return T'(Ada.Finalization.Limited_Controlled with 7);
>
> I still get bus error with this.
> Why should that make any difference, anyway (other than guessing
> around the compiler bug)? Qualification should not be necessary in
> this context, because the expected type for the aggregate is known
> from the function return type. There is no ambiguity here that would
> need to be resolved with the qualification.

You are correct -- the return T'(...) version should behave the same as
the return (...) version.  If it doesn't, that's probably a bug in the
compiler.

Either way, I don't see any good reason for a bus error here.

- Bob