From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,24d7acf9b853aac8 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news.mv.net!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: S-expression I/O in Ada Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:05:55 -0400 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: <547afa6b-731e-475f-a7f2-eaefefb25861@k8g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <984db477-973c-4a66-9bf6-e5348c9b95f2@n19g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <46866b8yq8nn$.151lqiwa0y2k6.dlg@40tude.net> <13b07f2c-2f35-43e0-83c5-1b572c65d323@y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <13tpf7ya3evig$.h05p3x08059s$.dlg@40tude.net> <1omt2srxtpsga$.c3hbxthzo6cf.dlg@40tude.net> <1e4cch2df5uyb.18brqdd16dhv8.dlg@40tude.net> <14y70ke8am9qw$.2csc9eflvigg.dlg@40tude.net> <4c601b5c$0$7665$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <9czktq4ntzq7.fhbsnocx0x4w$.dlg@40tude.net> <4c6030e3$0$7659$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: pcls4.std.com 1281373540 15369 192.74.137.71 (9 Aug 2010 17:05:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 17:05:40 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5uoVXzIVzdM2HKWuGrVrpn8pWYM= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12992 Date: 2010-08-09T13:05:55-04:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus writes: >> 7. No array index of > > These refer to arrays in general, not Boolean arrays as sets and, > I guess, the item numbered 7 follows a general rule: > Where the array type is visible, its index type is > visible. (Or else, you have been too lazy and used > an anonymous index type; still, you have 'first etc.) > Therefore, the index type can be named without > indirection, that is, via some array attribute function. > (Or else, index values can be made from 'first etc.) > Array access will be type checked either way. I think Dmitry was complaining in 7 that you can't do this: type Bit_Map is array(...) of Boolean; type T is array (Bit_Map) of Something; -- Illegal index type. whereas if Bit_Map is modular then you CAN do that. You can, but only if the number of bits is small. - Bob