From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,24d7acf9b853aac8 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: S-expression I/O in Ada Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 15:18:03 -0400 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: <547afa6b-731e-475f-a7f2-eaefefb25861@k8g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <46866b8yq8nn$.151lqiwa0y2k6.dlg@40tude.net> <13b07f2c-2f35-43e0-83c5-1b572c65d323@y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <13tpf7ya3evig$.h05p3x08059s$.dlg@40tude.net> <1omt2srxtpsga$.c3hbxthzo6cf.dlg@40tude.net> <1e4cch2df5uyb.18brqdd16dhv8.dlg@40tude.net> <14y70ke8am9qw$.2csc9eflvigg.dlg@40tude.net> <4c601b5c$0$7665$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <9czktq4ntzq7.fhbsnocx0x4w$.dlg@40tude.net> <4c6030e3$0$7659$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <4c6048fd$0$7663$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: pcls6.std.com 1281381468 19650 192.74.137.71 (9 Aug 2010 19:17:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 19:17:48 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:zxOqbZwkxUo5hqwPeugHmjy1kqM= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13009 Date: 2010-08-09T15:18:03-04:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus writes: > Always takes a while until my slow head grasps Dmitry's > non-Ada semantics. ;-) Dmitry has many "interesting" ideas about what Ada ought to be like, some (many?) of which I agree with. But it's important to keep straight the difference between "Ada as it is" and "Ada as Dmitry (or Bob, or ...) would like it to be". ;-) > case {T0 x T1 x T3} is > when ... => ... > > Static dispatch tables on composite types' values > switching to non-subprogram sequences of instructions > wrapped in a case statement that's likely to have > impressive combinatorial properties... I can think of several reasonable ways to implement such a feature. It would, of course, require a rather massive change to what "static expression" means. You can already do "case" on a 64-bit integer, so the compiler already has to deal with cases where a simple jump table is infeasible. > Is there no better way than this? > > Experimenting further, what will be a useful type of > case_statement_alternative's discrete choice list, then? > One that can be explored programmatically? Any non-limited type, I guess. - Bob