From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7a3b1c6915ea1273
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.196.130 with SMTP id im2mr2383884pbc.3.1326508861801;
        Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:41:01 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 lh20ni179584pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How many Ada compiler bugs are here?
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:41:01 -0500
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Message-ID: <wccty3zm2f6.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: <01dd6341-9c3c-4dcb-90f8-6ac66c65eb66@z1g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>
 <jentdh$4sd$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <98adc34c-deed-4190-9e10-755cb886984f@n39g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
 <r5zh8ht12meh$.wxldkm3c7893.dlg@40tude.net>
 <cb4706b1-0635-407f-9ed0-1e1d552ee279@n6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>
 <5cm1d9xlavps$.1tjtc88r9ze21$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <6d352870-d204-4137-a562-5a0b67db1f80@h13g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
 <15d37z3l8zllg$.3z2pj9cy5kvq.dlg@40tude.net>
 <7610c0ee-db98-4530-afab-f29e187ee7d0@h3g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
 <1swdtf9umcv6h.1abrhg4hr4tdd$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <189376d3-eab5-44a2-a7fc-8a227d1f6d70@k10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
 <pwkna5x23gnb.1p9mw4p0c2uny$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <wccboq7d4md.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <11extopcf5hsy.qk7psu30kjrp.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: pcls6.std.com 1326508861 14305 192.74.137.71 (14 Jan 2012 02:41:01
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 02:41:01 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wA4USgRpBXhQ80Ax7Cgv/D9eTAk=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-01-13T21:41:01-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:

> Cool! I never thought about that. Thanks!

You're welcome!

>>> BTW, I always wondered why cannot we have multiple parents of a package in
>>> Ada?
>> 
>> Sounds hugely complicated.
>
> Why? The only complicated thing would naming of the files.

Tree structures are easier to understand than more-complicated graphs.

I think it would make the visibility rules more complicated
for users (and harder to implement).

I'm not sure how to deal with private vs. public children.

Probably other stuff I haven't thought of.
Isn't Ada 2012 complicated enough?  ;-)

> Instantiation of multiple parent's generic child must be fun, but no more
> than generic child already is.

Yeah, well, generics multiply the complexity of anything
they interact with.

- Bob