From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4c459ff0adb576bc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-06 09:45:51 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!128.230.129.106!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.umass.edu!world!news From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: Refactoring and Ada Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 17:42:45 GMT References: <3C5AB0B7.9D75D49A@grammatech.com> <3C5E0ED6.E2D52BD3@adaworks.com> <5ee5b646.0202040959.37f71ade@posting.google.com> <3C5F38F2.FF0693AA@adaworks.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19674 Date: 2002-02-06T17:42:45+00:00 List-Id: Richard Riehle writes: > I have already posted my reasons for this in another message in > this thread. My use of the word, "dangerous" may be a bit of > an exaggeration, but I do think renames is sometimes a better > option than use type -- not always -- but as my other posts > suggests, sometimes. For what it's worth, the language design team wanted to make the behavior of "use type" happen without saying *anything*. Tucker invented "use type" as a compromise: many were worried about the upward incompatibility. - Bob