From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,57f8540942f8e060
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Initialization and Finalization of limited object "returned" by a
  function
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:10:19 -0500
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Message-ID: <wccsk961odg.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: <ed41ec55-1c33-4ea0-95db-01a89103d70a@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
 <wcceikrx0o1.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <d1d2586a-2f70-491a-8a12-01abae4ab6f5@t34g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
 <wcc4olnd1w0.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <75a9f860-ad3c-49a0-b2a1-a8f1386e6ff6@x10g2000prk.googlegroups.com>
 <2801be3a-afd6-4d14-ad7f-feb23a511f02@a5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
 <dc94f9cd-d9e9-400b-bb1d-836023f55724@x22g2000yqx.googlegroups.com>
 <wcc4olnid67.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <ca773655-6fbd-4fe7-8f42-df4ec27bd6d8@r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: pcls4.std.com 1265987409 13747 192.74.137.71 (12 Feb 2010 15:10:09
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:10:09 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DW24x5hqRlc6hvTPeHqy+/yLZSo=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9170
Date: 2010-02-12T10:10:19-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Hibou57 (Yannick Duch�ne)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr> writes:

> On 12 f�v, 00:08, Robert A Duff <bobd...@shell01.TheWorld.com> wrote:
>> Extended return statements are not so important for nonlimited types,
>> but they do come in handy in that case, too.
> While this may be useful, if it was, to have a way to return none-
> limited as built-in-place, for efficiency purpose (just suggesting
> this be to investigated, I do not assert this could surely be done
> like this and as-is).

Again, extended returns do NOT cause build-in-place.
For non-limited, the compiler may choose build-in-place
for efficiency in some cases.

- Bob