From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6b6619eb9cada212
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Help me to chose between ADA 95 and C++
Date: 1999/12/15
Message-ID: <wccr9goxsaq.fsf@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 560954060
Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
References: <01bf37fb$a91afb60$0564a8c0@IS-D2D04C.test>
 <B46461D2.259F%Harald.Schmidt@tomcat.de>
 <829rbv$a8m$1@nntp6.atl.mindspring.net> <01bf3e32$0b9dc880$022a6282@dieppe>
 <385112AE.7E2CFA9@rdel.co.uk> <833d8i$sjf$1@nntp5.atl.mindspring.net>
 <38566835.B4A2D48@rdel.co.uk> <x7v1z8p1btq.fsf@pogner.demon.co.uk>
 <38575F3A.9B5B0F9B@rdel.co.uk>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-12-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Chris Powell <chris.powell@rrds.co.uk> writes:

> I agree with you and found the whole thing quite frustrating. I tend to
> avoid safety critical work now... It always seemed like the decisions
> made about what we could and could not use were made by safety critical
> software experts, who were never programmers.

The "safety critical software experts" must know *something*.  After
all, airplanes fall out of the sky far less often than the software on
my desktop PC crashes.

- Bob