From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,844e8b7133f8d766
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-04-05 13:36:09 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!grolier!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!news2.euro.net!uunet!ash.uu.net!world!bobduff
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Bizarre JGNAT things
Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Message-ID: <wccr8z7jdaq.fsf@world.std.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 20:34:53 GMT
References: <9a5kqt$cnu$1@news.netmar.com> <3ac7598d_2@news3.prserv.net>
	<3AC865C2.763B1A90@earthlink.net> <9agq05$qs7$1@news.netmar.com>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:6528
Date: 2001-04-05T20:34:53+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

gary_the_fox@richmond.com writes:

> 
> Hello!
> Sure, I agree with all you say:-).
> However, the things I've described in the original are most likely a small bug
> in JGNAT. The problem is that if the compiler seemingly behaves erroneously
> if the compilation unit uses a package named, for instance, X and its own
> package name is of the form P1.P2.....X....P. For instance, the units that
> couldn't be compiled were child of COM.SUN.JAVA package and used JAVA top-
> level package. If I moved the code into a package that is not a child package
> of P1...JAVA, everything was OK. Since after the analysis of RM I've found no
> indication that this is illegal in Ada, it looks like a bug (Please, correct
> me if I'm wrong).

You would have to post the exact code to be sure.

But it sounds like you were hiding something called Java with another
name Java.

- Bob