From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7d14d8f47ca035bf
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-04-06 09:20:44 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!62.112.0.25!newsfeed.online.be!zur.uu.net!ash.uu.net!world!bobduff
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Ada Generic vs. C++ Templates
Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Message-ID: <wccr8z6ovai.fsf@world.std.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 16:19:33 GMT
References: 
 <MPG.1532ab1cc6ed7b4989682@news.chello.at><u90y6.289$UK4.27290@www.newsranger.com><3AC8E799.189EE51C@bigfoot.com>
	<U76y6.63$jz.1782@www.newsranger.com><3ACA4A12.9FC665D5@bigfoot.com>
	<3ACBBE65.D65BB767@worldnet.att.net><WMRy6.676244$U46.20968423@news1.sttls1.wa.home.com><9ahv88$99b$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
	<wccsnjnjdev.fsf@world.std.com> <9aimk9$h99$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:6571
Date: 2001-04-06T16:19:33+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Marin David Condic" <marin.condic.auntie.spam@pacemicro.com> writes:

>...I recall Ada implementations that
> did not take advantage of all the address space that may have been available
> to them, so why couldn't an implementation limit its address space to one
> byte?

> Why wouldn't it (legally speaking) pass validation?

Because it wouldn't pass the validation tests, of course!

- Bob