From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,aea4cc77526f5e4a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:26:22 -0500 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: <7xJvj.7420$Ru4.4246@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net> <5b9wj.4639$Mh2.1432@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: pcls4.std.com 1203873982 18970 192.74.137.71 (24 Feb 2008 17:26:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:26:22 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:KZr9p4bDSaQAhcpqPUvmPO9SVBg= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20042 Date: 2008-02-24T12:26:22-05:00 List-Id: writes: >... When the effect of the specification is deferred to the >implementation level, none of the other specifications should have to >be compiled. This is quite easy to do in Ada. Except for those pesky private parts. And generics. :-( - Bob