From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c2f62556e56c9683
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: 'with'ing and 'use'ing
Date: 2000/03/02
Message-ID: <wccputd8aqx.fsf@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 592332310
Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
References: <yoxzosjx5o1.fsf@dymock.dra.hmg.gb> <38BC2EB3.2639372B@acm.org>
 <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002291409180.6230-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
 <89l6aj$s5e$1@wanadoo.fr> <38BE974F.B8FAFEBE@earthlink.net>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-03-02T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@earthlink.net> writes:

> A nice technique here is to use the full name the first time that the name is
> referenced.  This informs the browser of where the name is to be found.
> Subsequent uses can then abbreviate the notation to just the name.  The use
> clause allows the compiler to do this, and the first fully named use allows the
> reader to understand it in context.


Hmm.  I don't think I like that idea.  If I saw:

    Some_Package.Grind_Upon_Data(...);
    ...
    Grind_Upon_Data(...);

I would tend to think there must be two different (overloaded) things
called Grind_Upon_Data.

- Bob