From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,97652a7fcb504670
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!198.186.194.249.MISMATCH!transit3.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit4.readnews.com!panix!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Got warnings when overriding Initialize and Finalize
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:54:53 -0400
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Message-ID: <wccprc3co1u.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: <b10ebd28-794c-45aa-99ee-a56c51271d2f@d4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
 <16dc507c-4b96-4b53-b46f-2e806f988e6e@h18g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
 <h38ori$2v7$1@munin.nbi.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: pcls6.std.com 1247583293 13575 192.74.137.71 (14 Jul 2009 14:54:53
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:54:53 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:yFIexnmU3hHsnXrekr+ydXfXRnY=
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7048
Date: 2009-07-14T10:54:53-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com> writes:

> "Adam Beneschan" <adam@irvine.com> wrote in message 
> news:16dc507c-4b96-4b53-b46f-2e806f988e6e@h18g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
>>...But there isn't anything wrong with your
>> original code.
>
> For the record, I agree with Adam. Claw is full of overridings like this; 
> our rule was that overridings should be done in the private part as there is 
> no reason for the client to know whether the routines are overridden or just 
> inherited. Looks like a bogus warning to me (and Adam's explanation makes 
> sense to me, too).

For what it's worth, the latest version of GNAT Pro does not give
these bogus warnings.  I don't know if the fix has made it
into public version(s) yet.

- Bob