From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,64a170311efeb61f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-13 15:56:07 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.uchicago.edu!newsfeed.cs.wisc.edu!loops.cs.wisc.edu!newsfeed.mathworks.com!news.mathworks.com!uunet!ash.uu.net!world!bobduff
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Storage Pool
Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Message-ID: <wccofrshtw3.fsf@world.std.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 22:55:40 GMT
References: <mailman.992469018.6376.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8701
Date: 2001-06-13T22:55:40+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

ANH_VO@udlp.com writes:

> Is it correct to assume that Size_In_Storage_Element mod Alignment = 0 for both
> subprograms Allocate and Deallocate for any type derived from Root_Storage_Pool
> as shown below

No.  But you can write a storage pool that requires that, and only use
it for types that obey that rule.

I have written storage pools that assume Alignment = 4 (and
pragma-assert so).

- Bob