From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,6ca5f0d94d4c145
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!novia!newspump.monmouth.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Distributed Computing in Ada
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:35:52 -0400
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Message-ID: <wccocq0vkpj.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: <7f8194ed-26d1-4a38-841b-6cb910b10ce4@j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
 <7ea2b1c2-a011-456e-9ec2-10c4ab75ee05@r38g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
 <wcc1vmx5l8w.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <h774e0$2h6$1@news.tornevall.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: pcls4.std.com 1251419752 5676 192.74.137.71 (28 Aug 2009 00:35:52
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:35:52 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:O41yjFY5hrf28yvMTqXMTnFtQg4=
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8023
Date: 2009-08-27T20:35:52-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.acm.org> writes:

> Robert A Duff wrote:
>> Well, not exactly the "original" design -- Annex E was not present in
>> Ada 83, and was added in Ada 95.
>
> Ada 83 had support for distribution. Tasks may run on separate
> processors; these processors need not all be part of the same
> computer.

Well, sort of, but not in a practical way.  Ada tasks share memory, and
there's no way to tell which variables are shared.  "Distributed" means
no shared memory.

I actually implemented such a system for Ada 83, where tasks could run
on different computers.  But there were some severe restrictions on
shared variables.  Terminate alternatives are "interesting" in that
context.

>...There was no language-defined way to specify which tasks run
> on which processors, but that's true with Annex E, too.

Yes.  But with Annex E there is a requirement that the implementation
provide some such mechanism.

- Bob