From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,57f8540942f8e060
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Initialization and Finalization of limited object "returned" by a
  function
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:09:52 -0500
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Message-ID: <wccocjue0e7.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: <ed41ec55-1c33-4ea0-95db-01a89103d70a@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
 <41b794ec-26b0-485e-a959-580a5b877a3b@f15g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
 <8e09c20d-172e-42a2-b2ff-994863893523@h12g2000yql.googlegroups.com>
 <wcczl3fgxum.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <ff4735cf-c7d7-420d-b17d-a53576e8a5d5@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
 <wccocju1o56.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <9c2b5c56-7abf-4523-844d-b48447587402@w27g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: pcls6.std.com 1266001779 27800 192.74.137.71 (12 Feb 2010 19:09:39
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:09:39 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KWJx9WGDC2QvdByhZ6J06pvzHG0=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9182
Date: 2010-02-12T14:09:52-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com> writes:

> I also remember some of the attempted rationalizations at the time; in
> particular, why did Ada use parentheses for both subprogram calls and
> array indexing, when other popular languages (Pascal and C) used
> square brackets for indexing.  Someone came up with an argument that
> it was actually a good thing to use the same characters for both,
> because then if your program uses Arr(Index), where Arr is an array,
> you could redesign your program to make "Arr" a function and the
> change would be transparent.  That seemed like a stretch at the time.

Well, this one makes a little more sense than the aggregate thing.
But it doesn't work if you say "Arr(Index) := ..."!

I have mixed feelings.

- Bob