From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a1ce307c10055549 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-12-17 08:40:38 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!news-hog.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!newshub.sdsu.edu!newshub1.wanet.net!uunet!sac.uu.net!ash.uu.net!world!news From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: calenday (was Re: IBM Acquires Rational Ada User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:39:45 GMT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: <3DF1615C.7AAAC86E@adaworks.com> <8db3d6c8.0212091445.12594821@posting.google.com> <3DF628C4.7090607@cogeco.ca> <3DF6653D.3030603@cogeco.ca> <8db3d6c8.0212101850.51506572@posting.google.com> <3DF8D33F.9020205@cogeco.ca> "Warren W. Gay VE3WWG" writes: >... It is also apparently bad > practice to rely on the representation, because I get the > impression that some Ada compilers may ignore the representation > clause. Ada compilers cannot ignore rep clauses. - Bob