From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,88e7ef9008757431 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: Function Calls by Address Date: 1999/09/23 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 528707957 Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) References: <37CADE68.6AF06F5D@escmail.orl.lmco.com> <37CEEFFA.7D73F78D@magic.fr> <7qooh7$hbh$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37CFFEA6.921CBE59@magic.fr> <37D03AA4.D26CF868@pwfl.com> <37DEB6F2.4DF91D2E@mitre.org> <37E81079.CC2566D9@mitre.org> <7sc717$cqk$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-09-23T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar writes: > I think you miss the point -- it is the other way round, if > there were a trivial conversion, then it would show that there > was no significant issue of expressive power. The fact that > there is no trivial conversion is *suggestive* of the fact that > there is some important issue of EP, but certainly not proof. Ah, now I see. Thank you! - Bob -- Change robert to bob to get my real email address. Sorry.