From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,be920da40970e1c2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-11-02 06:30:51 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.umass.edu!world!bobduff From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: gnat/ppc and a32 blt transfers Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:26:56 GMT References: <3A007357.FF3475A0@mindspring.com> <8tpvpl$ige$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34 Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:1719 Date: 2000-11-02T14:26:56+00:00 List-Id: "DuckE" writes: > Should't > > pragma Atomic( variable ); > > cause accesses to a variable to be performed as a single operation? Yes. And if the hardware can't do it, you'll get a compile-time error. - Bob