From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9ab1bf4be2d855dd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-07 17:16:12 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!newsfeeds.sol.net!newspump.sol.net!nntp.msen.com!uunet!ash.uu.net!world!bobduff From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: Questions: Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 01:14:23 GMT References: <97pfmt$ll30@tech.port.ac.uk> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34 Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:5530 Date: 2001-03-08T01:14:23+00:00 List-Id: "Mark Lundquist" writes: > But a *value* does not have a subtype! It has only a type! That's true for elementary types (eg integers), but composite *values* have a subtype. Eg, the string literal: "Hello, world." usually has subtype String(1..13). - Bob