From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada Annoyances
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 16:06:40 -0400
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Message-ID: <wcclgo95jfz.fsf@TheWorld.com>
References: <1ac5a44b-4423-443a-a7bb-2864d9abe78f@googlegroups.com>
	<d6b02354-93b5-4364-9fe5-3d22b47156e9@googlegroups.com>
	<be1619b4-2220-4287-8e67-1af32377d3f7@googlegroups.com>
	<oijkah$mnh$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
	<4921bd4e-3827-a7ac-7f2d-d60edbc514a3@tidorum.invalid>
	<oiphqk$osf$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
	<erd8jiFhsroU1@mid.individual.net>
	<oirvdf$t0$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
	<erl137Fp39dU1@mid.individual.net>
	<oj472o$kpr$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
	<ernkhnFcv3rU1@mid.individual.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell02.theworld.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1498853200 32763 192.74.137.72 (30 Jun 2017 20:06:40
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 20:06:40 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nKU3EtYFaFKYOmMmmHAI7p30Wx4=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:47241
Date: 2017-06-30T16:06:40-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> writes:

> I don't see how that could happen. In the changes I am suggesting (for
> the Maximum_Size aspect), the old and new tags would be in the same
> T'Class (the one to which the Maximum_Size aspect applies), and the type
> T would then either be derived from a Controlled parent, or not. So it
> seems to me that the object's controlled/uncontrolled status could not
> be changed by such a change of tag.

True, but you can add a component that is controlled.
So the outer object is not controlled, but it needs nontrivial
finalization.

- Bob