From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3a414836333dfef7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-11 05:38:26 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!uunet!ash.uu.net!world!news
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Subject: Re: Elaboration in GNAT
Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself)
Message-ID: <wcck7up80yy.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:35:17 GMT
References: <1006952193.650930@edh3>
 <5ee5b646.0111281125.7e9fbca3@posting.google.com> <1010151875.216658@edh3>
 <u3bh1tiuppk9c7@corp.supernews.com>
 <5ee5b646.0201041650.208d0918@posting.google.com>
 <wcc1ygx50tn.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <5ee5b646.0201102049.482cf72e@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18772
Date: 2002-01-11T13:35:17+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) writes:

> I understand that this is theoretically true, but in practice with
> GNAT's static model problems do not arise.
> We have not had one customer using the static model ever
> run into any elaboration problems at all.

I skept.  That is, I think you should say, "We have not had one customer
REPORT TO US ...."  :-)

- Bob