From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f51e93dacd9c7fca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-18 07:54:00 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!world!news From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: status of Ada STL? Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 14:52:22 GMT References: <3d0ce154_5@news.bluewin.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26243 Date: 2002-06-18T14:52:22+00:00 List-Id: "chris.danx" writes: > I'm not going to argue with you (you've made up your mind and so have I, > what's the point?), I'm just curious as to whether compilers would see A := > A / 2 and think "that code's dividing the matrix by 2 and assigning it to > itself. It might be better just to divide it inplace" leading to the same > thing. But then I'm largely ignorant of compilers. I don't think any Ada compilers are that smart. - Bob