From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: grassroots thoughts on access types Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2018 15:17:06 -0500 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: <5d9134c9-a7d4-468e-8685-ebbb393eabea@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell02.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1518207426 5360 192.74.137.72 (9 Feb 2018 20:17:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 20:17:06 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:usnc7qu74SqbCyyPG4W5p/PpmUg= Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:50345 Date: 2018-02-09T15:17:06-05:00 List-Id: "Jeffrey R. Carter" writes: > Anything that requires the use of anonymous access types is bad and > should not be used. So you won't use things like "A(X) := A(X) + 1;", where A is a Vector? Or "for X of A loop..."? - Bob