From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3dbf2f325f33ce35 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: Elimination of "use" clauses Date: 1999/07/21 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 503609402 Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) References: <377B5807.88B875E0@cs.york.ac.uk> <7lh74s$v36$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7ligdq$c8q$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7ljb4e$na9$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7ltus1$ah1@dfw-ixnews19.ix.netcom.com> <7mrjus$bet@dfw-ixnews14.ix.netcom.com> <7n0icj$1je@dfw-ixnews21.ix.netcom.com> <7n0ska$h20$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7n4r4e$5p$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-07-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Ted Dennison writes: > visible. If the following worked: > with FooBar; > ... > Foo FooBar.= Bar > > ...then perhaps we wouldn't be having this discussion. If that were allowed by the standard (assuming you could figure out how to parse it), I would forbid it in my project standards. It defeats the whole purpose of using operator symbols, just as badly as Foo_Bar."="(Foo, Bar). - Bob -- Change robert to bob to get my real email address. Sorry.