From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1c3d4536a687b7b0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-09-01 13:05:11 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-east!supernews.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.umass.edu!world!bobduff
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Ada 95 tasking problems with Ada 83 code
Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Message-ID: <wccitsfyj8q.fsf@world.std.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 20:01:25 GMT
References: <39ADAE51.30550667@mtws.visicom.com>
	<39ADD3A3.381DEF17@ix.netcom.com> <39AF20CE.FDBDFFFE@mtws.visicom.com>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:468
Date: 2000-09-01T20:01:25+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Wayne Lydecker <wayne@mtws.visicom.com> writes:

> Would it work OK to reverse what is going on here and create a new task
> to launch the main program and keep the test driver as a procedure?
> Would the text_io.get_line still block the main program?

Probably.

- Bob