From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7a1691a2185bb3e7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-19 06:33:24 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!netnews.com!xfer02.netnews.com!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!uunet!ash.uu.net!world!news From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: Bounds of Slice's return value Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 14:32:10 GMT References: <87bsfrcksf.fsf@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <3C48CAC8.AF186C93@acm.org> <87adva7h6k.fsf@chiark.greenend.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19101 Date: 2002-01-19T14:32:10+00:00 List-Id: Matthew Woodcraft writes: > Thanks. I'm glad they're nailing it down; it seems to be a needless > source of hard-to-spot errors, otherwise. The fact that Ada allows strings to start at other than 1, depending on where they came from, is a "needless source of hard-to-spot errors" even in cases where it *is* nailed down. Sigh. - Bob