From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,62f1e030ed61b97b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-15 14:39:59 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!world!news From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: newbie inquiry Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 21:38:38 GMT References: <3D07AB92.9181741D@acm.org> <4519e058.0206130735.21da9a4@posting.google.com> <3D08FCAE.D8977A71@web.de> <3D095981.8020005@telepath.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26039 Date: 2002-06-15T21:38:38+00:00 List-Id: Ted Dennison writes: > Freddy wrote: > > Sometimes even an SET type would be nice. > > Well, as I said, you sort of have one with arrays of booleans. It > doesn't handle large sparse sets as well as my old M2 compiler did, ... Really? I was under the impression that Modula-2 compilers implemented sets as packed arrays of booleans, and don't do anything special for sparse sets. What did your old M2 compiler do? - Bob