From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8a602a7f65bebaea X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-18 15:01:06 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!uunet!sea.uu.net!ash.uu.net!world!news From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: Abstract methods in ADA95 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 22:00:37 GMT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: <20021017-143635-828420@foorum.com> <3DAF0ECE.7080204@acm.org> <3DB07766.6010407@acm.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29931 Date: 2002-10-18T22:00:37+00:00 List-Id: Jeffrey Carter writes: > Robert A Duff wrote: > > Bah. Why be so pedantic about teriminology? > > A good question. Would you please explain how zaberqualls in Ada > figerlib pooterdags? Better than the zaberqualls in ? Point taken. ;-) - Bob