From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,18c2ea6497c437a8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-11-07 07:46:21 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.tufts.edu!uunet!dca.uu.net!ash.uu.net!world!news From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: differences between Ada83 and Ada95 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 15:44:56 GMT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:30540 Date: 2002-11-07T15:44:56+00:00 List-Id: "Gilles Goulas" writes: > I'm looking for a complete list of differences between Ada83 and Ada95 > (not only upward compatibility). You want the Annotated Ada Reference Manual (AARM). It's available at: http://www.ada-auth.org Each section contains headings: Inconsistencies with Ada 83 -- cases where a legal Ada 83 program has different run-time semantics in Ada 95 Incompatibilities with Ada 83 -- cases where a legal Ada 83 program is illegal in Ada 95 Extensions to Ada 83 -- cases where a legal Ada 95 program was not legal in Ada 83 When we designed Ada 95, we were pretty careful to document every change, and categorize them under the above headings. We missed a few obscure ones by accident, but they are almost 100% complete. - Bob