From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,24d7acf9b853aac8 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news.mv.net!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: S-expression I/O in Ada Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:30:17 -0400 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: <547afa6b-731e-475f-a7f2-eaefefb25861@k8g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <258zlxrv4fn6.1vszho1rtmf48$.dlg@40tude.net> <984db477-973c-4a66-9bf6-e5348c9b95f2@n19g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <46866b8yq8nn$.151lqiwa0y2k6.dlg@40tude.net> <13b07f2c-2f35-43e0-83c5-1b572c65d323@y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <13tpf7ya3evig$.h05p3x08059s$.dlg@40tude.net> <1omt2srxtpsga$.c3hbxthzo6cf.dlg@40tude.net> <1e4cch2df5uyb.18brqdd16dhv8.dlg@40tude.net> <14y70ke8am9qw$.2csc9eflvigg.dlg@40tude.net> <1y1c8zzqmcer5.po56hkesa968.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: pcls4.std.com 1281389403 24547 192.74.137.71 (9 Aug 2010 21:30:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 21:30:02 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:RH3h+xhwxRKi+gnYswjeejM3cHM= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13019 Date: 2010-08-09T17:30:17-04:00 List-Id: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" writes: > OK, but it is not modular, it is natural. And it is just a different case > where modular types should not be used in first place, like size_t. Right, the whole point of this part of the discussion is: I was trying to show how Ada's signed integer types could be improved to cover cases where Ada's modular types are commonly used. > This is will be a source of errors like forgetting mod or specifying wrong > modulus. The idea of modular types is to prevent such errors. I see that point, which was also made by others. I at least half-agree with it. > Yes, but what I want will never become Ada, so I prefer that minimum I can > get. (:-)) ;-) - Bob