From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!ottix-news.ottix.net!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Question about pragma Restrictions(No_Recursion) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:40:45 -0400 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1406054415 6802 192.74.137.71 (22 Jul 2014 18:40:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 18:40:15 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:1kjOzF0nGJpV4pWEPZsZ3IG0KqY= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21144 Date: 2014-07-22T14:40:45-04:00 List-Id: Peter Chapin writes: > This is to be contrasted with a number of the other restrictions listed > in H.4 that seem to put requirements on the compiler to explicitly > diagnose attempts to use the restricted feature. > > Does that sound right? Yes. - Bob