From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!ottix-news.ottix.net!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Functions vs constants Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:53:56 -0400 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1406217203 26289 192.74.137.71 (24 Jul 2014 15:53:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:53:23 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:xCkKvcdIV+zRLBMDaB/AbtlX+LY= Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:187834 Date: 2014-07-24T11:53:56-04:00 List-Id: Victor Porton writes: > You've misunderstood me. > > I don't say that every function should be equivalent to a constant, but just > that every constant should be equivalent to a function. > > A function that says "return new T" is not equivalent to a constant. I don't understand. What function is equivalent to this constant? X: constant A := new T; - Bob