From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Comparing Access Types Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:30:49 -0500 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: shell02.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1510331449 15693 192.74.137.72 (10 Nov 2017 16:30:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 16:30:49 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:zDfPkeGNKGXRatg/fUOclI6vkCk= Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48809 Date: 2017-11-10T11:30:49-05:00 List-Id: I wrote: > If "=" lies, then the Ada implementation is simply wrong. There were more than one Ada compiler for the 8086, and I'm pretty sure "=" on access values worked properly. It's really not hard to get it right -- in fact I think the compiler would have to go out of it's way to get it wrong. - Bob