From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,WEIRD_PORT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c1efbfe18e91d24 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-12-04 11:11:31 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.tufts.edu!uunet!dca.uu.net!ash.uu.net!world!news From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: Size of a pointer to a tagged record User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 19:10:28 GMT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:31444 Date: 2002-12-04T19:10:28+00:00 List-Id: news01+Steven.Murdoch@cl.cam.ac.uk (Steven Murdoch) writes: > If I take out the "Parameter_Access(...)" I get the following error message: > lua.adb:172:35: expected type "Parameter_Access" defined at lua.ads:13 > lua.adb:172:35: found type "System.Address_To_Access_Conversions.Object_Pointer" from instance at line 36 > so it seems that the result of To_Pointer is Object_Pointer rather than Parameter_Access. Oh yeah, you're right. I had forgotten how A_T_A_C works. Sorry about that. > Sorry, that's what I meant. 32 byte addresses would be a rather larger > address space that would be necessary :-) ;-) - Bob