From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a00006d3c4735d70 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-09 14:55:20 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!newsfeed.mathworks.com!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems Date: 09 Jan 2004 17:55:19 -0500 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: <3fe00b82.90228601@News.CIS.DFN.DE> <5802069.JsgInS3tXa@linux1.krischik.com> <1072464162.325936@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <1563361.SfB03k3vvC@linux1.krischik.com> <11LvOkBBXw7$EAJw@phaedsys.demon.co.uk> <3ff0687f.528387944@News.CIS.DFN.DE> <1086072.fFeiH4ICbz@linux1.krischik.com> <3ff18d4d.603356952@News.CIS.DFN.DE> <1731094.1f7Irsyk1h@linux1.krischik.com> <3ff1b8ef.614528516@News.CIS.DFN.DE> <3FF1E06D.A351CCB4@yahoo.com> <3ff20cc8.635997032@News.CIS.DFN.DE> <3ff9df16.30249104@News.CIS.DFN.DE> <3FFC0201.6020303@noplace.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pip1-5.std.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: pcls4.std.com 1073688919 32702 192.74.137.185 (9 Jan 2004 22:55:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 22:55:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4276 Date: 2004-01-09T17:55:19-05:00 List-Id: "Robert I. Eachus" writes: [stuff about random number generator] Note that Robert Eachus is truly an expert on random number issues. I wouldn't know a good random-number generation algorithm if it bit me on the behind. ;-) And I don't use them in my work. I (and others) were just using the "random" function as an example of a function that returns a sequence, one at a time, where we believe it's OK to have side effects (i.e. it's OK that the function returns a different value each time it's called). - Bob