From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: 109fba,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: 115aec,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: f43e6,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid109fba,gid115aec,gidf43e6,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.realtime,comp.software-eng Subject: Re: Teaching new tricks to an old dog (C++ -->Ada) Date: 24 Mar 2005 20:20:18 -0500 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: <4229bad9$0$1019$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <1110032222.447846.167060@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <871xau9nlh.fsf@insalien.org> <3SjWd.103128$Vf.3969241@news000.worldonline.dk> <87r7iu85lf.fsf@insalien.org> <1110052142.832650@athnrd02> <1110284070.410136.205090@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> <395uqaF5rhu2mU1@individual.net> <1111607633.301232.62490@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <4793664.vi5Yol0h1t@linux1.krischik.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: pcls4.std.com 1111713619 9898 192.74.137.71 (25 Mar 2005 01:20:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 01:20:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9942 comp.lang.c++:47145 comp.realtime:1696 comp.software-eng:5307 Date: 2005-03-24T20:20:18-05:00 List-Id: Martin Krischik writes: > All true. But does that powerfull contruct works inside a multi tasking > environment. I see no reason why such powerful exception handling features cannot be task/thread safe. In fact, many languages are superior to *both* Ada and C++ in this regard. > And tread save is not all. An Ada system implementing the (optional) Annex E > needs exeptions which can be passed from one process to another. Both > processed runing on different computers. Just like CORBA exceptions. Same comment for distribution: "I see no reason..." Of course, exceptions with attached information need some flattening to be passed across partitions. Followups disobeyed, sorry. I mean, you're answering somebody who's probably *not* reading comp.lang.ada, so I thought he should see *my* response. - Bob