From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c6acbb9f2027b8c9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: volatile vs aliased Date: 06 Oct 2005 15:37:47 -0400 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: <1128525722.605730.281980@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <87mzlnomca.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: pcls4.std.com 1128627467 17133 192.74.137.71 (6 Oct 2005 19:37:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 19:37:47 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5466 Date: 2005-10-06T15:37:47-04:00 List-Id: "Jeffrey R. Carter" writes: > Of course, if the C function has both pointer parameters and returns a > value, access parameters are the only thing available. Is ease of > interfacing to other languages another pro for allowing out and in out > parameters for functions, along with making side effects visible? Yes! And that argument was brought up during the Ada 9X design. Apparently, it didn't convince people. - Bob