From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,699cc914522aa7c4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news3.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Structured exception information Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:10:26 -0500 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: pcls6.std.com 1169572228 20292 192.74.137.71 (23 Jan 2007 17:10:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:10:28 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:9mfjx1z7hx242CdeVcqBysKHX+g= Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8433 Date: 2007-01-23T12:10:26-05:00 List-Id: Maciej Sobczak writes: > Robert A Duff wrote: > >> For that matter, I suppose even "null;" can raise >> Storage_Error! > > AARM 5.1/13: > > "The execution of a null_statement has no effect." But 11.1(6) (which says anything can raise Storage_Error) trumps that. It also trumps whatever paragraphs explain the semantics of "X := 1;". - Bob