From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Parameterless generic instance in place of opaque type instance Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 10:52:57 -0400 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1375023178 6284 192.74.137.71 (28 Jul 2013 14:52:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 14:52:58 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:hjPHUxgBlTyhWLpQRvWrA7HSd+s= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:16576 Date: 2013-07-28T10:52:57-04:00 List-Id: "Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)" writes: > For these types, a parameterless generic instance may be enough. I hope > most compilers are clever enough to not duplicate machine code for each > of these instances, and just duplicate their data (valid or invalid > assumption?). Randy's compiler is clever enough to do that. In fact it shares generic code always. There's a run-time cost to that, though. GNAT never shares code. Most Ada compilers I'm aware of do not share. - Bob