From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!xmission!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Dereferencing and style guides
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:49:41 -0400
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Message-ID: <wcchaco3fne.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: <slrnl4i6sh.1lme.lithiumcat@sigil.instinctive.eu>
 <wcczjquzd4b.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <5249ab97$0$6625$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <wccli2akvow.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <ff7657dd-00d1-4212-b451-7465b0aa38f9@googlegroups.com>
 <wccob70twny.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1310100934160.26647@debian>
 <23baa71a-6293-452c-89de-16052a198d20@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1381445381 18702 192.74.137.71 (10 Oct 2013 22:49:41
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 22:49:41 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zPzJlrypQ94J650u3cRD6hMk7ZI=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:17411
Date: 2013-10-10T18:49:41-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Adam Beneschan <adambeneschan@aol.com> writes:

> I can imagine that Ada might have adopted the same syntax, if only
> those old keypunch machines had a ^ character on them.

I thought they did.  Except it looked like an up-arrow.

Anyway, the solution to keyboards with missing characters
is clear: see J.2.  7-bit ASCII was standard at the time.

> On the other hand, I'm not sure about the idea that "making things
> just one character" equates to readability.  If that were true, APL
> would be the most readable language around.  And C would be second.

Well, I didn't say everything should be one character.  I said
the dereference operator should be one character.  So I'd say
APL is a bit of a straw man here.  I'm quite happy to say
"end if;" where C says "}".

In Ada, dereference is usually zero characters, so I'm actually arguing
for MORE verbosity!  Just a little more.

- Bob