From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,78b2880bc7e78e39 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-20 16:20:08 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!feed2.onemain.com!feed1.onemain.com!uunet!dca.uu.net!ash.uu.net!world!bobduff From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: RISC Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 00:18:17 GMT References: <98qumf$5sf$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <98r4g1$7r1$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3ab1d090$1@pull.gecm.com><98t8la$rc$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3ab72c8f$1@pull.gecm.com><997pq4$i35$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3ab79ade$1@pull.gecm.com><998ctp$ond$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <998o2h$sa2$1@nh.pace.co.uk> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34 Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:5948 Date: 2001-03-21T00:18:17+00:00 List-Id: "Marin David Condic" writes: > Sounds reasonable to me. I'd assume that the minute the standard says > "erroneous" I could safely expect that the compiler might make monkeys fly > from my serial port and this would be "legal" behavior. Hence I'd have to > "Boldly Go Where No Man Has Gone Before" and figure out what behavior I get > from *my* specific compiler in *my* environment and decide how far to trust > it. And whether that compiler is going to change. - Bob