From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d5cbc012ac099061
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-05-19 16:09:19 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!lnsnews.lns.cornell.edu!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!portc03.blue.aol.com!uunet!dca.uu.net!ash.uu.net!world!bobduff
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Non-Stub In Inner Scope?
Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Message-ID: <wccg0e1szrk.fsf@world.std.com>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 23:08:31 GMT
References: <NMBN6.5769$DW1.255373@iad-read.news.verio.net>
	<z2CN6.660$ce.1111604@newsrump.sjc.telocity.net>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7655
Date: 2001-05-19T23:08:31+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"David C. Hoos, Sr." <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com> writes:

> Just move the stub outside of the subprogram which now encloses it.

Yes, or put Wont_Work into a child package.

> > I'm having trouble with the problem of separate compilation.  If I
> > try this:
> >
> >     with Ada.Text_Io;
> >     package body Example is
> >        procedure Put_Line(Text: String) is
> >           function Wont_Work(Text: String) return String is separate;
> >        begin
> >           Ada.Text_Io.Put_Line(Wont_Work(Text));
> >        end Put_Line;
> >     end Example;

If Put_Line were also a subunit, it would work.  There's no particularly
good reason for it to work this way (IMHO), but that's the way it is:
you can't have a subunit more deeply nested like that.

But I generally prefer child units to subunits anyway...

- Bob